You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pacman is Archlinux's package manager and pacman -R - removes packages given via stdin after user confirmation.
The following works in bash:
[root@d415da14d875 ~]# echo vi | sudo pacman -R -
checking dependencies...
Package (1) Old Version Net Change
vi 1:070224-6 -0.31 MiB
Total Removed Size: 0.31 MiB
:: Do you want to remove these packages? [Y/n]
That is, it waits for user input before proceeding to remove the packages specified, but on Elvish the second command exits immediately:
~# echo vi | sudo pacman -R -
checking dependencies...
Package (1) Old Version Net Change
vi 1:070224-6 -0.31 MiB
Total Removed Size: 0.31 MiB
:: Do you want to remove these packages? [Y/n] Exception: sudo exited with 1
[tty 1]:1:11-26: echo vi | sudo pacman -R -
Interestingly, removing the use of sudo (echo vi | pacman -R -) makes the pipeline work on Elvish.
Since pacman has its stdin redirected, it must be reading its input directly from the terminal rather than FD 0.
I have a vague suspicion that this has to do with job control, and sudo is making some assumptions that somehow don't hold in Elvish.
What happened, and what did you expect to happen?
Pacman is Archlinux's package manager and
pacman -R -
removes packages given via stdin after user confirmation.The following works in bash:
That is, it waits for user input before proceeding to remove the packages specified, but on Elvish the second command exits immediately:
Interestingly, removing the use of
sudo
(echo vi | pacman -R -
) makes the pipeline work on Elvish.Since
pacman
has its stdin redirected, it must be reading its input directly from the terminal rather than FD 0.I have a vague suspicion that this has to do with job control, and
sudo
is making some assumptions that somehow don't hold in Elvish.Output of "elvish -version"
0.20.1+archlinux4
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: