-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Map all OTel attributes #183
Comments
Yes. We intend to change how we store OTel data, and in the future attributes should be stored as-is. e.g. |
@axw Is there any update on this? I'm trying to set up all Elastic collection via OTel/APM server for an application I'm working on, and I can't really do that if I can't use most Semantic Convention attributes, so I might have to switch to another collection method if this isn't coming soon. |
@josh-williams for ingesting OTel data without loss of fidelity, we're now more focused on contributions to OpenTelemetry Collector, and the elasticsearch exporter. We may still make this change to APM Server, but it's not likely to come as soon as originally anticipated. Just last week, support for indexing OTLP logs into Elasticsearch in a new "OTel-native" document structure was merged: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#33290. Attribute names are used as-is, embedded within a namespace such as Support for indexing metrics with this document structure is WIP (open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#34248), traces should be a fast follow, and then profiles. |
As of now, only some of the attributes are mapped.
Some attributes (like
process.command_args
,process.owner
,network.*
) don't have any mapping and are automatically stored underlabels
.Are there any plans to map them all? Or are there only specific ones that are supposed to be mapped?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: