Iceoryx hoofs for functional safety #1386
Answered
by
elBoberido
hemalbavishi
asked this question in
Q&A
-
Hello, I am just wondering whether unix domain socket functionalities within Iceoryx hoofs are compliant to functional safety. This question is arise because it is using std::string instead of cxx::string. Any reason why std::string is used instead of cxx::string |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
elBoberido
Jun 9, 2022
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
@hemalbavishi this is one of the classes which needs some refactoring before it is considered for use in a safety environment. This is part of #260 and we want to have this cleanups done by the release of iceoryx v3.0 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Answer selected by
hemalbavishi
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@hemalbavishi this is one of the classes which needs some refactoring before it is considered for use in a safety environment. This is part of #260 and we want to have this cleanups done by the release of iceoryx v3.0