You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi~, great work.
I tried to reproduce LISA's ciou results on the refcoco dataset, but the test results showed that both the 13B v1 and v0 models (LISA-13B-llama2-v1, LISA-13B-llama2-v0) could not reach the performance of the 7B model reported in the paper.
For example, for the results test with LISA-13B-llama2-v0 model on refcoco (In fact, I also tested the 7B model, and the accuracy is even worse): testA ciou 75.00
testB ciou 68.52
val ciou 72.22
But the 7B model in the paper achieves: testA ciou 76.5
testB ciou 71.1
val ciou 74.1
Hi~, great work.
I tried to reproduce LISA's ciou results on the refcoco dataset, but the test results showed that both the 13B v1 and v0 models (LISA-13B-llama2-v1, LISA-13B-llama2-v0) could not reach the performance of the 7B model reported in the paper.
For example, for the results test with LISA-13B-llama2-v0 model on refcoco (In fact, I also tested the 7B model, and the accuracy is even worse):
testA ciou 75.00
testB ciou 68.52
val ciou 72.22
But the 7B model in the paper achieves:
testA ciou 76.5
testB ciou 71.1
val ciou 74.1
Is this normal?
here is the command:
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 deepspeed train_ds.py --eval_only
here is the config:
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: