-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Placement according to the most suitable length and width? #240
Comments
hi, i can pay to change the algorithm as i want. |
There is no perfect box-packing algorithm in existence, so like all such algorithms BoxPacker is essentially a set of heuristics which due to their very nature will sometimes pick the non-optimal result. I'll take a look at this specific example when I next have time. |
Hi @dvdoug |
Hi sir, Have you had a review on this? |
Hi Sir,
First of all, thank you very much for the application, it is very successful.
However, I need a slight change in the insertion algorithm.
For parts, how can we always fill in the width and length in the most appropriate way?
How can you support this issue?
I have samples.
`
`
Result:
These items fitted into 2 box(es)
This box is a Le petite box, it is 220mm wide, 540mm long and 1mm high
The combined weight of this box and the items inside it is 0g
The items in this box are:
13-90x160
9-60x160
12-80x110
14-60x120
17-60x120
18-60x120
8-60x120
16-60x100
3-60x100
1-60x80
11-80x60
15-60x80
2-60x80
4-60x80
10-80x50
This box is a Le petite box, it is 220mm wide, 540mm long and 1mm high
The combined weight of this box and the items inside it is 0g
The items in this box are:
5-60x80
6-60x80
7-60x80
Placement possible sample image:
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: