You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since trashy no longer supports `trash <PATH> ...` and has given up on
being a drop-in trash-cli replacement, the executable name `trash` is
only a hinderance to greater adoption because it conflicts with the
trash-cli executable of the same name. Giving the executable a unique
name allows both programs to be installed without issue and also allows
programs that wish to shell out to external commands for trashing files
to support trashy by simply checking if an executable named `trashy` is
present. Before this change, these programs had to check the output of
the user's `trash` command to determine if it was from trash-cli or
trashy.
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ Range (min … max): 375.9 ms … 412.0 ms 10 runs
158
158
159
159
160
160
```
161
-
hyperfine 'trash list'
161
+
hyperfine 'trashy list'
162
162
```
163
163
164
164
```
@@ -174,9 +174,9 @@ Range (min … max): 175.6 ms … 181.0 ms 16 runs
174
174
175
175
No, see this [issue](https://github.com/Byron/trash-rs/issues/8)
176
176
177
-
### Should I alias rm='trash put'?
177
+
### Should I alias rm='trashy put'?
178
178
179
-
You should not. The alias will not be present on other systems and habits are really hard to break. An alternative is to alias `trash put` to `rt` or `tp`.
179
+
You should not. The alias will not be present on other systems and habits are really hard to break. An alternative is to alias `trashy put` to `rt` or `tp`.
0 commit comments