-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Liquidity mining through tokenized position staking #189
Comments
Is there a reason staking is required to get MEV rewards? Why not incorporate rewards into standard LP redemption? |
some relevant univ3 links: |
There are issues with how rewards are denominated (since they might not be in terms of the LPs underlying tokens. We can add it into standard redemption but we'll need some extra logic. |
@eljhfx what is standard redemption? |
@teddyknox I think you used the phrase "standard LP redemption" in one of your first questions so I was referring to that |
Ahh I see. Let's fully determine if it's viable to go with building MEV rebates into standard redemption because if not we should probably build pool incentivization and mev rebates under the same model. |
We have tried before The major problem is the token denomination of the MEV rewards /= the pool token type You can swap into that type but then need to handle some weird edge cases |
Yup. |
This is also discussed in #188
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: