Unit Of Work Support For JDBI #14
Comments
|
@isopropylcyanide Thanks for opening this issue and for your write-up! I see that your project is aimed ad jDBI 2.x (via dropwizard-jdbi) and not Jdbi 3 (via dropwizard-jdbi3). Since we split out the jDBI 2.x support in Dropwizard 2.0.0, it would make sense to create a pull request against https://github.com/dropwizard/dropwizard-jdbi/. What do you think? |
|
I agree. I'll raise it over there. Thank you. |
|
@isopropylcyanide I've transferred the issue to the other repository. |
|
@joschi I think the issue was transferred here. Can we resurrect this thread? Does it make sense if I work towards migrating this to JDBI v3. Do you see a value in this project? |
There still seem to be some projects using jDBI 2.x with Dropwizard 2.x:
So merging https://github.com/isopropylcyanide/dropwizard-jdbi-unitofwork into this project would definitely not be wasted effort. On a personal note, it would be great to get both, support for jDBI 2.x in this project and getting support for JDBI 3.x in https://github.com/dropwizard/dropwizard/. Feel free to open a PR here for merging the upstream project and I'll be happy to review & merge. 😃 |
|
I'll work on both. Need to test changes for 3.x though. Thanks for the visualization on the usages of 2.0. Pretty cool. |
I've published a package to
Maven Centralthat I've developed to add Support for Unit of Work for a Dropwizard App that usesJDBIusing a@JdbiUnitOfWorkannotationThe project lives here: https://github.com/isopropylcyanide/dropwizard-jdbi-unitofwork
I'm interested in contributing upstream. Would really appreciate if someone can review the source and see if it's worth it.
It is being actively used in our production since the last quarter. I have also published a series of articles on the same
Part I
Part II
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: