Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Can you provide a new condition type in custom data validation, such as tree selection? #3866

Open
2 tasks done
Mmh-1997 opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
backlog We are not actively seeing into this. scope:data validation

Comments

@Mmh-1997
Copy link

初始清单

  • 这真的是个问题吗?
  • 我已经在 Github Issues 中搜索过了,但没有找到类似的问题。

问题

在实际开发过程中,数据验证的条件类型可能不是单一的,并且也不能通过自定义公式去满足业务需求,因此,需要一个能够自动扩展条件类型的入口,来满足我们更多的业务需求,比如,如何自定义添加一个树形选择的数据验证。

@univer-bot univer-bot bot changed the title [Feature] 能否提供一个自定义数据验证中的条件类型新增,比如树形选择 [Feature] Can you provide a new condition type in custom data validation, such as tree selection? Oct 28, 2024
@univer-bot
Copy link

univer-bot bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿

Origin Title: [Feature] 能否提供一个自定义数据验证中的条件类型新增,比如树形选择

Title: [Feature] Can you provide a new condition type in custom data validation, such as tree selection?


Initial list

  • Is this really a problem?
  • I've searched Github Issues but haven't found any similar issues.

question

In the actual development process, the condition type of data verification may not be single, and business needs cannot be met through custom formulas. Therefore, an entrance that can automatically expand condition types is needed to meet more of our business needs, such as , how to customize data validation for adding a tree selection.

@weird94
Copy link
Contributor

weird94 commented Nov 2, 2024

目前数据验证API还不够稳定,未来会考虑开放自定义数据验证规则注册的能力。

@univer-bot
Copy link

univer-bot bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿

At present, the data verification API is not stable enough. In the future, we will consider opening the ability to register custom data verification rules.

@jikkai jikkai added the backlog We are not actively seeing into this. label Nov 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backlog We are not actively seeing into this. scope:data validation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants
@jikkai @weird94 @zhaolixin7 @Mmh-1997 and others