Improve Condition Handling

[lokyst]

Tighten scope of condition handling options and improve the naming and descriptions in the help text.

For the Monte Carlo simulator implement 3 types of condition handling:

• Ignore condition requirements - the outcome of an action that requires specific conditions is always assumed to succeed.
• Enforce condition requirements - the outcome of an action that requires specific condition will only succeed if the conditions were met when the action was used
• Smart conditions / Override conditions - actions requiring specific conditions are stripped from the sequence and reapplied to the simulation in sequence only when conditions are met. This might mean that some actions never have an opportunity to take place.

For the Expected Value model we want to implement condition handling so that they mirror the options for the Monte Carlo simulator.

• Ignore condition requirements - the outcome of an action that requires specific conditions is always assumed to succeed with the full benefit applied.
• Enforce condition requirements - the outcome of an action that requires specific conditions will be weighted by the probability of the required conditions occurring at that step in the sequence.
• Name needed - the outcome of the first (second, etc.) action requiring specific conditions in position N of the sequence is weighted by the probability that the required conditions will be met at least once (twice, etc.) by that step. Current thinking is to use a Monte Carlo simulator to determine the probabilities a priori because the math is hard (since conditions are dependent, but do not appear to fall into the model of an Urn problem).

[h-e-c]

I was about to open the new # about this and found it finally at the bottom "of the pit" here ... Any update on handling the conditions?

[doxxx]

Nope, sorry!