You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I believe there might be an enhancement that could offer added utility in certain scenarios. Specifically, when setting up a conditional filter, would it be feasible to introduce an option (perhaps with a checkbox) that displays the descendant nodes? I've done a preliminary review of the code and noticed the TreeFilterViewItem objects appears to be structured as a flat list. Would the integration of such a feature need a major restructuring or there is a straightforward way to append the descendant nodes to these objects?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I considered that, but it made it confusing to keep track of which nodes matched and which were children of matches.
A work-around is to select a node of interest then toggle between "End Filter" and "Filter" in the dialog. It will stay selected and show you where it lives in the tree.
I believe there might be an enhancement that could offer added utility in certain scenarios. Specifically, when setting up a conditional filter, would it be feasible to introduce an option (perhaps with a checkbox) that displays the descendant nodes? I've done a preliminary review of the code and noticed the TreeFilterViewItem objects appears to be structured as a flat list. Would the integration of such a feature need a major restructuring or there is a straightforward way to append the descendant nodes to these objects?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: