fix: history saving when navigate through parties #1350
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mbacherycz has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 3 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/frontend/src/api/useParties.ts (2)
102-115: Consider enhancing utility functions with explicit returns and error handling.The extracted utility functions improve code organization, but could benefit from:
- Explicit return types and undefined cases
- Error handling for edge cases
Consider these improvements:
- const selectSpecificParty = () => { + const selectSpecificParty = (): PartyFieldsFragment | undefined => { const partyFromQuery = getSelectedPartyFromQueryParams(searchParams); return partyFromQuery && data?.parties?.find((party) => party.party.includes(partyFromQuery)); }; - const selectCurrentEndUser = () => { + const selectCurrentEndUser = (): PartyFieldsFragment | undefined => { return data?.parties?.find((party) => party.isCurrentEndUser); };
117-132: Enhance error handling in party selection logic.While the party selection logic is well-structured, the error case could provide more context for debugging.
Consider enhancing the error message:
- console.warn('No current end user found, unable to select default parties.'); + console.warn( + 'No current end user found, unable to select default parties.', + { availableParties: data?.parties?.length ?? 0 } + );packages/frontend/tests/stories/loginPartyContext.spec.ts (1)
113-129: Consider enhancing test coverage and clarity.The test effectively verifies the back button navigation behavior, but could be improved:
- The test title could be more specific, e.g., "Back navigation restores previous party selection state and theme"
- Consider adding URL parameter assertions like other tests:
expect(new URL(page.url()).searchParams.has('party')).toBe(false); expect(new URL(page.url()).searchParams.has('allParties')).toBe(false);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/frontend/src/api/useParties.ts(3 hunks)packages/frontend/tests/stories/loginPartyContext.spec.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/frontend/src/api/useParties.ts (3)
4-4: LGTM: Import addition aligns with history management requirements.
The addition of useLocation is appropriate for tracking URL changes and managing navigation history.
Line range hint 1-153: Overall changes look good and align with PR objectives.
The refactoring improves code organization and fixes history-related issues by:
- Properly tracking URL changes with useLocation
- Extracting clear, single-responsibility utility functions
- Implementing proper party selection logic with error handling
The changes maintain good separation of concerns while fixing the history saving functionality.
134-139: Verify effect dependencies and potential update cycles.
While the effect's dependencies are more precise now, we should verify that:
- The effect doesn't create infinite update cycles through location changes
- Party selection persists correctly during navigation
Let's verify the implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have sufficient information about the implementation:
No infinite update cycle risk detected in the effect implementation
The implementation is safe because:
handlePartySelectiononly updates URL params withreplace: trueoption, preventing history stack growth- URL updates through
setSearchParamsare controlled and only occur in specific scenarios:- When selecting all organizations
- When selecting a specific party
- When stripping query params for party selection
- The effect only runs when there's actual party data (
data?.parties?.length > 0) and successful query (isSuccess)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential infinite loops in effect handling
rg -A 5 "setSearchParams.*location"
# Check for other useEffect implementations that might conflict
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$) {
$$$
setSearchParams($$$)
$$$
}'
Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of handlePartySelection and its usage of URL params
rg -A 10 "handlePartySelection.*="
# Check for any setSearchParams usage in the file
rg -A 5 "setSearchParams"
# Look for the implementation of the useParties hook
ast-grep --pattern 'const useParties = () => {
$$$
}'
# Check for any location or search param related effects
rg -A 10 "useEffect.*location"
Length of output: 5268
packages/frontend/tests/stories/loginPartyContext.spec.ts (2)
78-78: LGTM: Improved class assertion with regex pattern.
The change from strict class matching to regex pattern matching makes the test more resilient to CSS module variations while maintaining the core assertion logic.
113-129: Verify integration with useParties hook changes.
The test effectively covers the history saving functionality mentioned in the PR objectives. However, since this integrates with changes in the useParties hook, let's verify the complete implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the party selection implementation to verify the complete integration.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Test correctly verifies party selection state management
The test aligns perfectly with the implementation in useParties hook which:
- Manages party selection through URL search params
- Handles state updates via
setSearchParams - Preserves state during navigation through browser history
The test effectively verifies this implementation by:
- Checking the correct party selection state after navigation
- Verifying theme persistence
- Testing the back navigation functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration between the test and useParties hook implementation
# Test 1: Check if useParties hook handles history state
echo "Checking useParties hook implementation..."
rg -A 5 "useLocation|history" "packages/frontend/src/api/useParties.ts"
# Test 2: Verify no other tests are affected
echo "Checking for other history-related tests..."
rg -A 5 "goBack|history" "packages/frontend/tests"
Length of output: 1708
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the party selection implementation and state management
echo "Checking party selection implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function useParties() {
$$$
}'
# Check for query param handling
echo "Checking query param handling..."
rg -A 5 "setSearchParams|getSelectedParty" "packages/frontend/src"
Length of output: 6177
mbacherycz
force-pushed
the
fix/history_back_btn_should_read_query
branch
from
0743d27 to
8c18006
Compare
mbacherycz
force-pushed
the
fix/history_back_btn_should_read_query
branch
from
8c18006 to
309e173
Compare
Closes: #1346
Hva er endret?
Dokumentasjon / Storybook / testdekning
storiesiStorybook, eller så er ikke dette relevant.Skjermbilder eller GIFs (valgfritt)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
usePartieshook.Tests