You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When installing the common-utils feature, the feature installation fails since apparently my base container configuration (in this case /etc/issue) would be modified and an interactive prompt causes the install to fail:
Configuration file '/etc/issue'
==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation.
==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
What would you like to do about it ? Your options are:
Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : start a shell to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version.
One option would be to use the following apt-get options when installing packages:
-o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confdef" - use the default answer if a configuration file should be replaced.
-o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" - use the old configuration file if a configuration file should be replaced. Just in case the --force-confdef doesn't work.
Note this happened to me using the common-utils features, but I would assume its not isolated to this feature.
Would a pull request be accepted for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When installing the
common-utils
feature, the feature installation fails since apparently my base container configuration (in this case/etc/issue
) would be modified and an interactive prompt causes the install to fail:One option would be to use the following
apt-get
options when installing packages:-o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confdef"
- use the default answer if a configuration file should be replaced.-o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold"
- use the old configuration file if a configuration file should be replaced. Just in case the --force-confdef doesn't work.Note this happened to me using the
common-utils
features, but I would assume its not isolated to this feature.Would a pull request be accepted for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: