Unsupported platform/architecture: darwin-arm64

[Romick2005]

Is there any solution for M1 silicon apple chip?

[jkb-kt]

Same issue here. Please advise.

[keyofd]

Same issue here.

[JingeXC]

Hello guys, here is the way I fix this issue.

check this repo
https://github.com/JingeXC/ffprobe-static

[romankaravia]

Hello guys, here is the way I fix this issue.

check this repo https://github.com/JingeXC/ffprobe-static

In case anyone else is looking for a solution here, note that https://github.com/JingeXC/ffprobe-static contains an x64 binary in the arm64 folder (because probably nobody actually has an arm64 binary, see also eugeneware/ffmpeg-static#19 (comment)).

Nevertheless, this might be a good solution to start, in case anyone is willing to put in some work:

• Point darwin/arm64 to latest x64 binary (which works perfectly fine on arm64 thanks to Rosetta)
• Might as well update all existing binaries while you're at it
• Publish new package to npm

[johnnyshankman]

Hello guys, here is the way I fix this issue.
check this repo https://github.com/JingeXC/ffprobe-static

In case anyone else is looking for a solution here, note that https://github.com/JingeXC/ffprobe-static contains an x64 binary in the arm64 folder (because probably nobody actually has an arm64 binary, see also eugeneware/ffmpeg-static#19 (comment)).

...

• Publish new package to npm

Can we not merge in the extra commit on this fork as a PR and get this moving along? I too am stuck on this right now. Don't want to maintain my own fork longterm if possible.

[johnnyshankman]

Also it seems https://github.com/eugeneware/ffmpeg-static has official ARM64 binaries now as well as ffbinaries.com

[johnnyshankman]

@joshwnj heyo we need you to come back for an afternoon and merge/approve some super straight forward PRs please

#17