You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need more information to make any sort of meaningful decision. What must it provide to be useful? Are there any examples that clearly demonstrates its utility? Does it have any unique or surprising qualities? What does any of this have to do with language-oriented programming?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At this stage, the existing syntax classes are low hanging fruit, but not necessarily that valuable to other developers. They're only much use for operating on algebraic functions or macros. The design just needs some polish: better names, more refined classes, miscellaneous tweaks.
A more substantial use case might require access to the information Algebraic Racket uses to generate definitions and hooks into the stages of a computation for checking types and whatnot. A simple coverage check (e.g. "you forgot a case for SomeProduct") would be useful. A more sophisticated exhaustivity check would be even better.
The next release brings three major updates:
match
andsyntax-parse
Most of the work will be for number 3.
We need more information to make any sort of meaningful decision. What must it provide to be useful? Are there any examples that clearly demonstrates its utility? Does it have any unique or surprising qualities? What does any of this have to do with language-oriented programming?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: