You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your remarkable contributions to the field of histopathology report generation. Given the limited research in this area and the scarcity of available datasets and code, your work and the publicly released resources are of immense value to advancing studies in this domain.
I am currently attempting to reproduce the results from your paper. As mentioned, there are few available report generation models, which makes the "SOTA models on WSI report generation" described in Table 1 of your paper particularly interesting.
I would like to better understand how these classic models were adapted for the histopathology report generation task. Could you kindly provide the code for the baselines used in your paper? Sharing these details would further propel research in this field and be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and for sharing your excellent work with the community.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My understanding is that these models were not specifically adapted for the task of histopathology report generation. Instead, it seems that these are standard report generation models, where features extracted from thousands of patches are directly fed into the model.
Could you confirm if my understanding is correct? Any additional details or clarification would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your interest. Indeed, these models (e.g., R2Gen, R2GenCMN) were originally designed for radiology report generations, where an input image is much smaller than a WSI (normally 512 x 512 pixels).
Thus, these models usually use full self-attention, which is no longer suitable for adaptation to WSI patches (thousands of patches lead to unaffordable computational overhead in full self-attention). Thus, to leverage them as baselines for histopathology report generation, one needs to first implement a token selection method for these models to screen the most useful patch tokens in the patch sequence to avoid the computational burden.
And in our experiment, we tried uniform sampling and cross attention-based token compression.
We will include the codes for these baselines in the next coming week.
Thank you for your remarkable contributions to the field of histopathology report generation. Given the limited research in this area and the scarcity of available datasets and code, your work and the publicly released resources are of immense value to advancing studies in this domain.
I am currently attempting to reproduce the results from your paper. As mentioned, there are few available report generation models, which makes the "SOTA models on WSI report generation" described in Table 1 of your paper particularly interesting.
I would like to better understand how these classic models were adapted for the histopathology report generation task. Could you kindly provide the code for the baselines used in your paper? Sharing these details would further propel research in this field and be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and for sharing your excellent work with the community.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: