Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Double-check node handling of inline datum in inputs #110

Open
SebastienGllmt opened this issue Aug 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Double-check node handling of inline datum in inputs #110

SebastienGllmt opened this issue Aug 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@SebastienGllmt
Copy link
Contributor

I really want to believe the node implementation doesn't match what the spec implies on handling of inline datums in inputs where you'd have to duplicate inline datums inside the witness set.

See add_reference_input and input_required_wits
@SebastienGllmt SebastienGllmt added the question Further information is requested label Aug 20, 2022
@SebastienGllmt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Somebody mentioned to me that if they spend an inline datum and yet specify the datum of the input in their own transaction, they get a NonOutputSupplimentaryDatums error. I haven't verified this myself though

@SebastienGllmt SebastienGllmt changed the title Double-check node handling of inline inputs Double-check node handling of inline datum in inputs Sep 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@SebastienGllmt