Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support RFC 3253 (Versioning Extensions) #30

Open
jwodder opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Support RFC 3253 (Versioning Extensions) #30

jwodder opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request therefor needs research More information is required under consideration Dev has not yet decided whether or how to implement WebDAV Specific to the WebDAV protocol/implementation

Comments

@jwodder
Copy link
Member

jwodder commented Jan 29, 2024

RFC 3253 seems to be largely concerned with resource version history, but it looks like there may be some things in there that are more generally applicable.

@jwodder jwodder added enhancement New feature or request therefor needs research More information is required under consideration Dev has not yet decided whether or how to implement WebDAV Specific to the WebDAV protocol/implementation labels Jan 29, 2024
@yarikoptic
Copy link
Member

For the read-only operation, as what we have here ATM, what versioning aspects besides providing ETAGs (for files only or also for collections/folders where available) are "in play"?

@jwodder
Copy link
Member Author

jwodder commented Feb 14, 2024

@yarikoptic

  • For what's currently implemented, the only things that could be viewed as versioning-related are etags and "modified" timestamps.

  • As regards RFC 3253, I haven't looked at all of it yet (that's part of this issue), but it seems to define some WebDAV features that dandidav could support even without actual versioning, like a <DAV:supported-live-property-set> element (though, looking further into this at the moment, it seems that particular example is only allowed if versioning is fully supported).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request therefor needs research More information is required under consideration Dev has not yet decided whether or how to implement WebDAV Specific to the WebDAV protocol/implementation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants