List numbering: reversed styles, inconsistent delimiters.

[d5ous]

This outputs as expected with AsciiDoc 8.6.8 HTML backend:

1. This is a list item, with arabic numbering
   a. This is another list item, with loweralpha numbering
   A. This is at list level 3, with upperalpha numbering
   i) Level 4, lowerroman numbering.
   I) Level 5, upperroman numbering

Tested with ODT backend (v. 0.1, downloaded 12/3/2012).

.Issues:

• Inverts some of the numbering styles.
• It also echoes the parentheses used in AsciiDoc syntax as delimiters, but the delimiters should probably be consistent among all list levels in the backend output.

[d5ous]

Ahem. That looked fine formatted as AsciiDoc. I should learn to read instructions. Here's the sample again.

1. This is a list item, with _arabic_ numbering
a. This is another list item, with _loweralpha_ numbering
A. This is at list level 3, with _upperalpha_ numbering
i) Level 4, _lowerroman_ numbering.
I) Level 5, _upperroman_ numbering.

[dagwieers]

Yes, at the moment the numbering styles are hardcoded in the stylesheet. Since we cannot "template" the stylesheet, doing this correctly is hard to impossible, unless we can agree on some work-around with the AsciiDoc project.

[d5ous]

Well, I agree that the trivial fix isn't that appealing bloat-wise if there
are alternatives. Chaining to a post-processing script to auto-generate
referenced styles post-hoc wouldn't be too bad, but it... probably wouldn't
be the only one you had to write before you were finished.

-d.

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Dag Wieers [email protected] wrote:

Yes, at the moment the numbering styles are hardcoded in the stylesheet.
Since we cannot "template" the stylesheet, doing this correctly is hard to
impossible, unless we can agree on some work-around with the AsciiDoc
project.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/38#issuecomment-10957589.