Couple of Gantt view improvements #1698
Labels
data workflows team
Work pertaining to the analysis/gantt/etc views
UX/UI
User experience and interface improvements
Milestone
When selecting a lot of tasks, the dropdown input expands a lot. It's possible to customise what is displayed in the dropdown input so it can just say how many are selected instead
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/61982285/310465860-df83b323-c45d-44b3-9dc0-82e43935c31a.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.Y80EH1O8pTqHrzQt0UT8JoDgBq7I-olsUbQ_Lf4OFaM)
When no tasks match the filters, it shows a blank chart with 0-5. It could say "no matching tasks" instead
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/61982285/310466341-3a70b136-fc07-4104-aa21-8afba3cb9507.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3Mzg5ODc5MzUsIm5iZiI6MTczODk4NzYzNSwicGF0aCI6Ii82MTk4MjI4NS8zMTA0NjYzNDEtM2E3MGIxMzYtZmMwNy00MTA0LWFhMjEtOGFmYmEzY2I5NTA3LnBuZz9YLUFtei1BbGdvcml0aG09QVdTNC1ITUFDLVNIQTI1NiZYLUFtei1DcmVkZW50aWFsPUFLSUFWQ09EWUxTQTUzUFFLNFpBJTJGMjAyNTAyMDglMkZ1cy1lYXN0LTElMkZzMyUyRmF3czRfcmVxdWVzdCZYLUFtei1EYXRlPTIwMjUwMjA4VDA0MDcxNVomWC1BbXotRXhwaXJlcz0zMDAmWC1BbXotU2lnbmF0dXJlPWFhODQwOTc0NzU3MTBiNmE2Y2I2YjYwOGI4ODdiNGFhYjJhOWU3NWNiNzBjM2QzMGFhZDE1NzYxYmQ3MzVjOTcmWC1BbXotU2lnbmVkSGVhZGVycz1ob3N0In0.NQLoANVDNgoxMVWuDEB21oIoRlS2cdQu9s7orw0OQc4)
Originally posted by @MetRonnie in #1466 (review)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: