You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One can see that d_1 is as intended, while s_1 is wrong. One can also test that as long as we don't use symmetries in the tensor, the slicing works fine for both dense and sparse tensors:
Dear Edgar,
As the title suggests, I provide a minimal example to reproduce it. I am using the latest commit on master: commit c4f89dc
One can see that d_1 is as intended, while s_1 is wrong. One can also test that as long as we don't use symmetries in the tensor, the slicing works fine for both dense and sparse tensors:
I ran the examples on 1 core only.
If you need further information, please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Ke
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: