You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using the code, I observe very big experimental randomness. For example, on QNRF dataset, I obtain results on test set as follows (MAE and MSE): run 1: 87.621, 149.75 run 2: 92.988, 168.47 run 3: 96.175, 167.79
In the paper, 85.6 and 148.3 are reported. May I ask if the authors have some ideas to reduce the big experiment randomness? With this big randomness, how can we draw conclusion on which model performs well and which doesn't?
Thanks a lot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Using the code, I observe very big experimental randomness. For example, on QNRF dataset, I obtain results on test set as follows (MAE and MSE):
run 1: 87.621, 149.75
run 2: 92.988, 168.47
run 3: 96.175, 167.79
In the paper, 85.6 and 148.3 are reported. May I ask if the authors have some ideas to reduce the big experiment randomness? With this big randomness, how can we draw conclusion on which model performs well and which doesn't?
Thanks a lot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: