We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As mentioned in PR #19 (comment), currently the naming convention for getters in struct interfaces is mixedbetween
foo
foo()
getFoo()
Before reaching 1.0.0 we should decide what naming convention to use to offer a unified API.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
As mentioned in PR #19 (comment), currently the naming convention for getters in struct interfaces is mixedbetween
foo
, the getter is also calledfoo()
andfoo
, the getter is calledgetFoo()
Before reaching 1.0.0 we should decide what naming convention to use to offer a unified API.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: