You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Terminating a worker on which a job is running should be a transparent operation:
The worker should stop, nacking the current step processing and it should be then picked by a different worker and processed as if nothing happened (unless the workflow itself has been suspended).
It seems however that sometimes the thread interruptions makes the current step to fail:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mikub
changed the title
Stopping a worker can lead to a workflow job failure
Terminating a worker via thread interrupt can lead to a workflow job failure
Dec 8, 2021
Terminating a worker on which a job is running should be a transparent operation:
The worker should stop, nacking the current step processing and it should be then picked by a different worker and processed as if nothing happened (unless the workflow itself has been suspended).
It seems however that sometimes the thread interruptions makes the current step to fail:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: