Unifying CIECAM02 & CAM16.

[TFiFiE]

Would it be in the scope of this project to consolidate as much as CIECAM02 and CAM16 have in common in a single codebase and make explicit exactly how they differ?

[KelSolaar]

Hi @TFiFiE,

From a code standpoint, CAM16 almost entirely piggyback on CIECAM02, if you look at the module imports it is quite significant. I prefer the separation of concerns, makes the code a bit more manageable and importantly, CAM16 is not CIECAM16, it is not blessed by the CIE, so I would rather keep it separate. Hope that makes sense.

Cheers,

Thomas