Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #22

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

6feferonka9
Copy link

Fixes and added a new exchange

Fixes and added a new exchange
@cointastical
Copy link
Owner

What causes you to believe that LocalCoinSwap is custodial?

https://localcoinswap.com/learn/custodial-vs-non-custodial

@6feferonka9
Copy link
Author

Hello, it is because they do not explain how they actually implement non-custodial solution.

If you use localcoinswap.com, to sell, you first need to send BTC to "wallet" that is generated on their side and it seems to be in their full custody. After, when you have a trade, the amount of the trade is deducted from this "wallet" they generated for you.

I don't know would they make this non-custodial. Maybe they do, but I think there should be more transparency on their side. I once asked them about this, but I got no response. The article provided by you is just an explanation of differences.

This article provides more insight:
https://github.com/LocalCoinSwap/bitcoin-trading-scripts

But, if you can get unencrypted private keys in their admin panel, just with one click, they must store it somewhere on their side.

It could be the trade itself is implemented as "non-custodial" but they do have access to your funds, as far as my research goes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants