You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current map does a great job of highlighting areas where a high percentage number of households are "cost-burdened". The generally accepted measure of affordability seems to 30%, which you are using as a benchmark. The current color scale goes from white to dark blue to denote the percentage of people who are cost-burdened. Using a color like red, which is universally associated with "danger", "warning", etc, might help communicate that these areas have an affordability problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current map does a great job of highlighting areas where a high percentage number of households are "cost-burdened". The generally accepted measure of affordability seems to 30%, which you are using as a benchmark. The current color scale goes from white to dark blue to denote the percentage of people who are cost-burdened. Using a color like red, which is universally associated with "danger", "warning", etc, might help communicate that these areas have an affordability problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: