Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support for storage to implement custom resource synchro #677

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024

Conversation

Iceber
Copy link
Member

@Iceber Iceber commented Jun 18, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


@clusterpedia-bot
Copy link

Hi @Iceber,
Thanks for your pull request!
If the PR is ready, use the /auto-cc command to assign Reviewer to Review.
We will review it shortly.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using comments are available here.
If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the gh-ci-bot repository.

@clusterpedia-bot clusterpedia-bot added the kind/feature New feature label Jun 18, 2024
@Iceber Iceber force-pushed the add_resource_synchro_factory branch 2 times, most recently from 036df0d to e402630 Compare June 18, 2024 10:26
@Iceber Iceber changed the title support for storage to implement custom resource synchro [WIP] support for storage to implement custom resource synchro Jun 18, 2024
@Iceber Iceber force-pushed the add_resource_synchro_factory branch 2 times, most recently from 1047c6d to 227bb97 Compare June 24, 2024 06:28
@Iceber Iceber changed the title [WIP] support for storage to implement custom resource synchro support for storage to implement custom resource synchro Jun 24, 2024
@Iceber Iceber force-pushed the add_resource_synchro_factory branch from 227bb97 to 965b1cd Compare August 30, 2024 03:15
@Iceber Iceber merged commit 05f0505 into clusterpedia-io:main Sep 5, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants