You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm wondering if there's any rationale for accepting 0 as pool size.
I've found this basically blocks forever (claypoole version 1.1.4).
(cp/upmap 0 (constantly 1) [])
As you may have guessed, I didn't want to actually pass 0 as thread pool size - it was a bug in my code.
But I would prefer if claypoole functions would throw instead of silently blocking the current thread.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm wondering if there's any rationale for accepting 0 as pool size.
I've found this basically blocks forever (claypoole version 1.1.4).
As you may have guessed, I didn't want to actually pass 0 as thread pool size - it was a bug in my code.
But I would prefer if claypoole functions would throw instead of silently blocking the current thread.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: