You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After adding some predefined sets to the "staticCss" property in the PandaCSS config, the build takes very long time.
There doesn't seem to be any caching mechanism/ incremental build, that prevents from rebuilding the whole CSS. Even if only a single property is added/ modified, the whole CSS seems to be regenerated.
Is that correct?
Problem Statement/Justification
Caching the staticCss generated parts would speed up the build process. Then only the required parts could be rebuilt.
This discussion was converted from issue #3107 on May 20, 2025 14:01.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description
After adding some predefined sets to the "staticCss" property in the PandaCSS config, the build takes very long time.
There doesn't seem to be any caching mechanism/ incremental build, that prevents from rebuilding the whole CSS. Even if only a single property is added/ modified, the whole CSS seems to be regenerated.
Is that correct?
Problem Statement/Justification
Caching the staticCss generated parts would speed up the build process. Then only the required parts could be rebuilt.
Proposed Solution or API
Alternatives
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions