Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#1749

Open
4 tasks done
markmonster opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks done

#1749

markmonster opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
emoji Gitmoji proposals.

Comments

@markmonster
Copy link

Emoji symbol

Emoji code

Emoji description

Applying the Boy Scout Rule.

Describe the use case of your emoji

When you are working on a feature you have to leave the campground cleaner than you found. At least according to The Boy Scout Rule that can be found in the "Clean Code" book by Robert C. Martin. You want these changes to be distinguished from the code belonging to the feature you're working on, but sometimes it's hard to give it a specific gitmoji, hence this proposal.

Is this use case covered by an existing emoji?

No ❌

Does this emoji fall into the "how" or the "what" category?

  • This proposal do not describe "how" a commit was made, but does in fact describe "what" is the contents of the commit about.

Examples

Removed some unused code.
Renamed variables or methods to make it more readable.
Small adjustments to adhere to code style.

Validations

@markmonster markmonster added the emoji Gitmoji proposals. label Jun 5, 2024
@cruzdanilo
Copy link

i think those examples are already covered

  • removed some unused code: ⚰️ (remove dead code)
  • renamed variables or methods to make it more readable: 🎨 (improve structure/format of the code)
  • small adjustments to adhere to code style: 🎨 (improve structure/format of the code)

@markmonster
Copy link
Author

I think you are right here. 👍🏻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
emoji Gitmoji proposals.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants