Skip to content

Commit 085587b

Browse files
committed
Minor tweaks and typos
1 parent a269fc5 commit 085587b

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

CIP-XXXX/README.md

+3-2
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ Category: Wallets
55
Status: Proposed
66
Authors:
77
- Ola Ahlman <[email protected]>
8+
- Marcel Baumberg <[email protected]>
89
Implementors:
910
- Eternl <https://eternl.io/>
1011
Discussions:
11-
Created: 2022-02-24
12+
Created: 2025-01-22
1213
License: CC-BY-4.0
1314
---
1415

@@ -223,7 +224,7 @@ performance by only having to scan for a restricted amount of keys.
223224
#### Why not encourage and scan any account index, and not just index 0?
224225
Account indexes is a very useful feature for normal wallets to separate funds, multi-delegation and much more.
225226
However, for multisig wallets, they add little value. The idea behind a multisig is that each participant is its own
226-
identify, either person or wallet. Having multiple keys in the multisig from the same root key adds false security.
227+
identity, either person or wallet. Having multiple keys in the multisig from the same root key adds false security.
227228

228229
#### But what if I want to utilise the benefits of account separation for fund splitting between the same set of participants?
229230
This can easily be solved without additional accounts by adding an `after` timelock with the current slot height of

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)