You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Cpv3, get_ton_equivalent and Absorber_project_carbon (formerly called project_value in Cpv2) have different usages compared to their previous versions.
Should we keep these functions as they are or adapt them?
Additional context
get_ton_equivalent:
This function might be utilized for better interoperability across various types of projects, not limited to carbon credits.
It converts different units to ton equivalent, which could enhance the system's versatility.
Absorber_project_carbon:
Currently, it represents the total absorption of the project in grams.
It is a storage variable that should be updated during a rebase.
It might be more effective as a view getter, calculated from the sum supply of vintages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
In Cpv3, get_ton_equivalent and Absorber_project_carbon (formerly called project_value in Cpv2) have different usages compared to their previous versions.
Additional context
get_ton_equivalent
:Absorber_project_carbon
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: