-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing and State Transition #197
Comments
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For workflows which recycle machines - HPC and the like, it's handy to create, run, and operate based on the return values of both commissioning and test scripts. Defining scripts as resources and then assigning those to a
machine
resource for execution when its state goes tocommissioning
ortesting
would permit the next iteration using a selector of ready/tested machines to do one thing while the cohort of test/script failures would be run through a different branch of logic.Rough requirements:
script
resource with commissioning/test type and contents (preferably validating MaaS' markup syntax in the header comments)script
s tomachine
resourcesinstance
or astate
mechanism of some kind formachine
to permit testing/commissioning/marking-broken (presumably to end an autonomous workflow and make a human handle it)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: