Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Current 2.8.4 image contain critical security vulnerability #361

Open
shahar-davidson opened this issue Jun 19, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Current 2.8.4 image contain critical security vulnerability #361

shahar-davidson opened this issue Jun 19, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@shahar-davidson
Copy link

As of today, the latest Caddy 2.8.4 for Alpine contains a security vulnerability that is ranked as Critical: CVE-2024-24790⁠ (published on June 4, 2024)

This vulnerability appears to have been fixed already in the latest golang:1.22 for Alpine image.

Therefore, caddy image needs to be recreated with the latest Golang image (1.22.4 or later)

image

@dewbjorn
Copy link

Having the exact same issue

@francislavoie
Copy link
Member

IMO that CVE is way overclassified. It's not that severe at all. It's just a minor bug. I'm pretty sure it's not a problem for any Caddy users, we don't check if an IP is loopback in security sensitive contexts. If someone can show a case where that can happen, then it would be more of a concern.

@shahar-davidson
Copy link
Author

That's true - it's seems overclassified for Caddy.
But if a newer Caddy image can be created with a bumped Golang version then that would be nice.

@JinChin24
Copy link

That's true - it's seems overclassified for Caddy. But if a newer Caddy image can be created with a bumped Golang version then that would be nice.

Somebody know where is a good tutorial for build this ?

@jdvorak001
Copy link

Also dependabot is suggesting a new release: caddyserver/caddy#365 and caddyserver/caddy#366. See also #367.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants