We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This started in #225
Goal: JSON Serialize / Deserialize WIT Records based on WIT field names.
Centralize JSON serialization in the cm package, keeping codegen changes to a minimum.
cm
Given a complex record type:
record response { headers: list<tuple<string, list<string>>>, http-code: u16, body: response-body } variant response-body { ok(list<list-element>), err(function-error), platform-err(platform-error) } record list-element { optional-int: option<u64>, optional-bool: option<bool>, } record function-error { error: string } record platform-error { code: string, message: string }
and filling it up:
hdrVals := cm.ToList([]string{"value1", "value2"}) hdrTuple := cm.Tuple[string, cm.List[string]]{ F0: "header-name", F1: hdrVals, } headers := cm.ToList([]cm.Tuple[string, cm.List[string]]{hdrTuple}) v := somefunctioninterface.Response{ Headers: headers, HTTPCode: 200, Body: somefunctioninterface.ResponseBodyErr(somefunctioninterface.FunctionError{Error: "failed"}), }
We should serialize it to JSON as:
{"headers":[["header-name",["value1","value2"]]],"http-code":200,"body":{"err":{"error":"failed"}}}
For comparison, this is what is produced today:
{"Headers":{},"Body":{"RequiredParam":"required","OptionalParam":{}}}
Whenever possible, reuse standard mappings. string -> string, u32 -> uint32, etc.
Tuples are encoded as json arrays with explicit nulls.
null
Tuple[string,int] -> [ "some string", 42 ] Tuple3[string, *string, int] -> [ "some string", null, 42 ]
Variants are encoded as json dictionaries, so they can carry the variant data.
record somerecord { myvariant: somevar, } variant somevar { ok, err(string), } // JSON { "myvariant": { "ok": true }} { "myvariant": { "error": "error value" }}
Options rely on explicit null for the "None" case.
{ "myoptional": null } // cm.None { "myoptional": "this" } // cm.Option[string]
Today they end up with tag = 0, this impacts de-serialization of variants. We need the ability to distinct between:
tag = 0
var v Variant
v := NewVariantWithZeroTagValue()
v := Some(NewVariantWithZeroTagValue)
atm only the Some() path de-serializes correctly ( pointers ).
Some()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can we move the design and task list for this to an issue?
Then we can have discrete PRs that implement JSON support for different types?
Sorry, something went wrong.
lxfontes
No branches or pull requests
This started in #225
Goal: JSON Serialize / Deserialize WIT Records based on WIT field names.
Progress
Approach
Centralize JSON serialization in the
cm
package, keeping codegen changes to a minimum.Given a complex record type:
and filling it up:
We should serialize it to JSON as:
For comparison, this is what is produced today:
Type encoding
Whenever possible, reuse standard mappings. string -> string, u32 -> uint32, etc.
Tuple handling
Tuples are encoded as json arrays with explicit
null
s.Variant handling
Variants are encoded as json dictionaries, so they can carry the variant data.
Option handling
Options rely on explicit
null
for the "None" case.Questions
Zero Value Variants
Today they end up with
tag = 0
, this impacts de-serialization of variants. We need the ability to distinct between:var v Variant
v := NewVariantWithZeroTagValue()
v := Some(NewVariantWithZeroTagValue)
atm only the
Some()
path de-serializes correctly ( pointers ).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: