Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provenance tracking features? #8

Open
johnomotani opened this issue Aug 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Provenance tracking features? #8

johnomotani opened this issue Aug 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@johnomotani
Copy link
Collaborator

One of the nice things about having a repo like this with version-controlled configurations is that it makes it easier to do provenance tracking. Just having the repo exist is a pretty good start, as e.g. STORM can grab the commit hash (plus git diff if there is one) and save it. Just wondering if we could add any features to this repo (and/or BOUT-dev) to make provenance tracking easier... For example when configuring could we package up some info about BOUT-configs (git hash + git commit + which configuration [i.e. machine] is being used + ??) and inject it into some CMake variables that BOUT could then put into revision.hxx or something and save to dump files. Could maybe have some shared utility scripts that could be called in different configurations to create the CMake arguments.

@johnomotani johnomotani added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 17, 2022
@ggeorgakoudis
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this issue relevant anymore?

@johnomotani
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Is this issue relevant anymore?

Yes, still seems like it would be nice to have if anyone had time to implement.

@ggeorgakoudis
Copy link
Collaborator

We are moving towards using spack for environment configuration and soon enough BOUT++ building. Spack has full version provenance in the building recipe. Is that the feature you are looking after?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants