We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The "DATS Model" entry in the table of contents at https://datatagsuite.github.io/docs/html/ references https://wg3-metadataspecifications.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dats.html, but that link is 404.
There are two similar (identical?) copies of the DATS documentation at https://datatagsuite.github.io/docs/html and https://wg3-metadataspecifications.readthedocs.io. If they are the same, can that be made clear? (Note that the DATS Model link in the latter resolves, so they are not entirely identical.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apologies for the confusion. This repository is the old repository and everything has been moved to the Data Tag Suite organization.
I've modified the old documentation (https://wg3-metadataspecifications.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) to include a link to the latest documentation at: https://datatagsuite.github.io/docs/html/
I've also fixed the problem of the visualization of the schemas. So now you can see them here:
https://datatagsuite.github.io/docs/html/dats.html
I will revise the whole documentation so that the links are updated to the new repository.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The "DATS Model" entry in the table of contents at https://datatagsuite.github.io/docs/html/ references
https://wg3-metadataspecifications.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dats.html, but that link is 404.
There are two similar (identical?) copies of the DATS documentation at
https://datatagsuite.github.io/docs/html and https://wg3-metadataspecifications.readthedocs.io. If they are the same, can that be made clear? (Note that the DATS Model link in the latter resolves, so they are not entirely identical.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: