Poll: What's your expected behavior of set_fields and --set? #3932
Replies: 2 comments
-
For me the main issue is that if fields are not set on each individual track, they are not detected in paths configuration. For example I used to have a configuration like this:
But this meant that I could not simply do Anyway, a way to change this is to maybe split the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
(Duplicated from Discourse...) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi everybody,
we are discussing the expected behavior of the set_fields configuration, which uses the
set_fields
configuration file block and the--set
command line option. #3927Question for you: Should fields be set on the imported album only, or also on each individual track?
In the current implementation, fields are set on the imported album only. Hence
beet list
won't let you filter for those fields unless you provide the-a
flag. With-a
, however, you will see a list of albums instead of individual tracks.There are some discussions on the board (e.g. here or here or here) and on the internet (e.g. here) where people expect that fields are also set on each individual track. In particular, this would imply that the fields are also written to the metadata of the track files instead of only beets' database.
Main question: Would changing the implementation from album in database only to write each individual track file break your setup?
Please share your thoughts.
Thank you!
PS: Also posted on discourse.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions