Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bacalhau Roadmap #1151

Closed
15 tasks done
aronchick opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed
15 tasks done

Bacalhau Roadmap #1151

aronchick opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@momack2
Copy link

momack2 commented Dec 1, 2022

hey @aronchick - can I have a TLDR version of your roadmap that includes 5 milestones or less in the same form as the FVM roadmap? I'm thinking "GA Launch", "Ship onboarding for XYZ SDKs / onboarding flows", etc - each milestone should be worth writing a "shipped" blog post about. I'd really like to link to these milestones from the EngRes and Filecoin roadmaps - but right now there are way too many things here to figure out what to point to.

@aronchick
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Happy to do whatever! The issue is the FVM roadmap is way smaller in scope - e.g. it only talks about a very specific deliverable (developer tooling) relevant for a specific audience (filecoin developers).

Would you like us to scope down to this level? Or would you like one deliverable by segment/audience? Just lemme know!

@wesfloyd wesfloyd closed this as completed Jan 2, 2023
@aronchick aronchick reopened this Jan 2, 2023
@wesfloyd
Copy link
Contributor

wesfloyd commented Jan 2, 2023

Woops - sorry 🤦‍♂️

@momack2
Copy link

momack2 commented Feb 9, 2023

I disagree that the FVM roadmap is smaller in scope. There is a lot of partnership, DX, engineering, security, and collab work embedded in each of these milestones - but they've done the hard work of boiling down the capabilities into a single "big rock" that marks a large xfunc upgrade in capabilities and value creation. I'd like to see you find these "big rocks" for bacalhau across threads and user groups - really judging by when someone outside the project would care and get to make use of an important step function upgrade in utility. Those "outside" folks could be end users or developer integrations (ex via FVM contracts to call compute over data), but milestones that are only about internal bookkeeping / incremental progress should be kept on more work-oriented trackers (instead of this "stakeholder" level roadmap).

@momack2
Copy link

momack2 commented Mar 9, 2023

@aronchick can you please come to my office hours and we can try to work through some better milestones for Cod? I think this would really help the project to align on these!

@lukemarsden
Copy link
Contributor

lukemarsden commented Mar 17, 2023

Hey @momack2, I've updated our starmap:

image

With a new top-level Engineering - 1.0 Launch - Projects issue issue:

image

This hopefully captures the "big rocks" for Bacalhau across threads and user groups which we are targeting before our 1.0 launch on May 9. I've added a description to each of the issues in #2179 which hopefully articulates the user-facing value. Happy to receive any feedback on how to make these better. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants