Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing features #240

Open
mlankipalli opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Missing features #240

mlankipalli opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@mlankipalli
Copy link

  • Add duration as argument for the profiling.
  • Add output_dir to store the results in given path
  • Add how to read the metrics collected by aperf?
  • single command for both record and report, its useless to have recording data without report, then why to have a separate command for record alone?
  • colour code the obvious performance issues from the collected events.
@janaknat
Copy link
Contributor

janaknat commented Dec 9, 2024

  1. What is the reason for the argument for profiling. Currently, aperf profiles for the duration of the run.
  2. output_dir is used with default aperf given names?
  3. Currently no support exists to read aperf collected metrics independently.
  4. We separate the record and report so as enable users to only run record on sut. The report can be generated from any linux machine. aperf report has overhead which should be avoided for all users.
  5. We can consider adding this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants