You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Feature Description
Is there any update on wildcard support for thingNames in shadowDocumentsMap? I see in this issue there was talk of adding but I cannot find any updates.
Use Case
Why do you need this feature?
I apply a deployment to a large number of devices. All with the same shadow document configuration and use. Adding the thingName and configuration is cumbersome for each new device added. This also means the effective configuration located on each device lists all other device names. Out of preference more than anything I'd like for each device's configuration to be dedicated for that device only and not contain anything for other devices. Please let me know if my understanding is correct as well. I may be missing something crucial on why this works the way it does.
Proposed Solution
Below is an example doc using the # in place of a thingName. I have not looked at the open source code explicitly so I am unaware how it parses through the shadowDocumentsMap. Thank you for any time or explanation that may be given to this. I appreciate it.
Feature Description
Is there any update on wildcard support for thingNames in shadowDocumentsMap? I see in this issue there was talk of adding but I cannot find any updates.
Use Case
Why do you need this feature?
I apply a deployment to a large number of devices. All with the same shadow document configuration and use. Adding the thingName and configuration is cumbersome for each new device added. This also means the effective configuration located on each device lists all other device names. Out of preference more than anything I'd like for each device's configuration to be dedicated for that device only and not contain anything for other devices. Please let me know if my understanding is correct as well. I may be missing something crucial on why this works the way it does.
Proposed Solution
Below is an example doc using the
#
in place of a thingName. I have not looked at the open source code explicitly so I am unaware how it parses through the shadowDocumentsMap. Thank you for any time or explanation that may be given to this. I appreciate it.Other
Add detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, links for us to have context, etc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: