Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Synchronize general documentation #40

Closed
jonaslagoni opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 9 comments · Fixed by #148
Closed

Synchronize general documentation #40

jonaslagoni opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 9 comments · Fixed by #148
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale

Comments

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

jonaslagoni commented Mar 10, 2021

Reason/Context

The files CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, FUNDING.yml, SECURITY.md, and SUPPORT.md should IMO be synchronized to the organization's repositories to provide a coherent documentation experience.

Description

As @derberg suggested on Slack there are two solutions to this.

  1. Synchronzie the documents
  2. Repository "owners" create their own wrappers to files such as CONTRIBUTING.md and simply reference this repository.

There are pros and cons for both solutions, so what fits best?

I assume it is somewhat related to #38

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 10, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 60 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label May 10, 2021
@derberg derberg removed the stale label May 10, 2021
@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented May 10, 2021

this is very much needed, people still expect CONTRIBUTING file as part of the repo as a file on the root. Habits 🤷🏼

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 60 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jul 10, 2021
@derberg derberg removed the stale label Jul 26, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 60 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Sep 25, 2021
@derberg derberg removed the stale label Sep 27, 2021
@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Sep 27, 2021

I think it is going to happen pretty soon 😄 stay tuned

@Relequestual
Copy link

IMHO this requires 3 things to be useful.

  1. Comment in the document (markdown comment) which says that the doc is managed at another location (providing that location link)
  2. Configurable as to which of the documents are synced
  3. Configurable as to which repos the sync will go to

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Oct 6, 2021

@Relequestual

1 - yup, we do it with the workflow files already. Just that instead of markdown comment it should be HTML comment that is visible only in a source file IMHO
2 - yup, this is how will it work, you basically provide a list of files
3 - yes yes yes, or no 😄 I was thinking about it, like a "topic" that you set on a repo to say you shall not pass, but on the other things, I was thinking about an approach that actually the contribution guide anyway must be as generic as possible, and should be copied everywhere and then per repo you just need to have "contribution guide extensions", like additional files, repo specific 🤔

@Relequestual
Copy link

you just need to have "contribution guide extensions", like additional files, repo specific 🤔

You could broaden this. Use configs in repos to find MD or HTML partials which are inserted, and you've got yourself a templating system.

But, I would suggest this feature doesn't prohibit the others being released.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants