-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: add command for transferring issue #314
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
left some comments,
you also need to add this new workflow to https://github.com/asyncapi/.github/blob/master/.github/workflows/global-replicator.yml#L141 to have it replicated to all other repos
.github/workflows/transfer-issue.yml
Outdated
|
||
jobs: | ||
transfer: | ||
if: ${{(!github.event.issue.pull_request && github.event.issue.state != 'closed' && github.actor != 'asyncapi-bot') && (contains(github.event.comment.body, '/trasfer-issue') || contains(github.event.comment.body, '/ti'))}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should probably start using starts with instead of contains
@KhudaDad414 thoughts?
.github/workflows/help-command.yml
Outdated
@@ -58,5 +58,6 @@ jobs: | |||
At the moment the following comments are supported in issues: | |||
|
|||
- \`/good-first-issue {js | ts | java | go | docs | design | ci-cd}\` or \`/gfi {js | ts | java | go | docs | design | ci-cd}\` - label an issue as a \`good first issue\`. | |||
example: \`/gfi js\` or \`/good-first-issue ci-cd\`` | |||
example: \`/gfi js\` or \`/good-first-issue ci-cd\` | |||
- \`/trasfer-issue {repo-name}\` or \`/ti {repo-name}\` - trasfers issue from the source repository to the other repository passed by the user. example: \`/ti cli\` or \`/trasfer-issue cli\` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
trasfer
all over the place
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also aren't we missing a closing ` at the end of the line here?
would be good if you test new workflow and this help workflow in private repo to be 100% sure it all works - before we push it to all the other repos
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't think any ` is missing, it is rendering this
/transfer-issue {repo-name}
or/ti {repo-name}
- transfer issue from the source repository to the other repository passed by the user. example:/ti cli
or/transfer-issue cli
.github/workflows/transfer-issue.yml
Outdated
COMMENT="${{github.event.comment.body}}" | ||
REPO=$(echo $COMMENT | awk '{print $2}') | ||
echo repo=$REPO >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT | ||
- name: Trasfer Issue |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would be very useful to have some interaction with user of the command here,
if transfer fails (most probably some typo of repo name of misuse of command) we should drop a proper comment in issue that command failed, and they have to make it better - I'm pretty sure we do it for good first issue command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have added a step to check if the repo is under the same org and write a comment explaining this to the user.
.github/workflows/transfer-issue.yml
Outdated
script: | | ||
const r = process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY | ||
const [owner, repo] = r.split('/') | ||
const repoToMove = process.env.REPO_TO_MOVE | ||
const issue_number = process.env.ISSUE_NUMBER |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please always use context
if code is executed in github-script
action, so do not read for example issue number from env variables but like this: context.issue.number
…ithub into trasferIssue-command
run: | | ||
gh issue transfer ${{github.event.issue.number}} asyncapi/${{steps.extract_step.outputs.repo}} | ||
env: | ||
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} | |
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GH_TOKEN }} |
changing to out bot token
const r = process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY | ||
const [owner, repo] = r.split('/') | ||
const repoToMove = process.env.REPO_TO_MOVE |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
technically where is REPO_TO_MOVE
and GITHUB_REPOSITORY
coming from?
@Souvikns ping in case you forgot about this one |
Description
In this PR I am adding a new workflow file to trasfer issue from one respository to another in AsyncAPI organisation. The command is
/trasfer-issue {repo-name}
or/ti {repo-name}
for exampleRelated issue(s)
Resolves #311