Replies: 1 comment
-
If you haven't already, see jj to support similar workflows in a more principled manner. Besides the
It's possible in principle to have git-branchless notify itself in-memory about rewrites it performed,
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The feature of git-branchless I'm most interested in using is
git move
and possiblygit sync
. I'm curious what would happen if I were to delete the.git/hooks
thatgit branchless
sets up. Would these commands still work? Would they work but only in a degraded state?If it wouldn't work at all, I'd love to be able to read a discussion of what these commands and the hooks themselves do at a high level, so that I can update my own mental model of how
git branchless
works.Currently I'm assuming that the hooks work in support of features like
git undo
and the ability to track commits not associated with a branch. But if I only plan to usegit move
for the sake of rebasing trees of commits reachable from branches, andgit move
wouldn't be expected to work for this use case without.git/hooks
, I'd be curious to learn more.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions