You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue: Incorrect Naming of HDI Columns in summary output
Thanks for producing a very useful and great tool! I've found a small thing that would improve Arviz.
The summary function produces HDI columns labeled as hdi_<alpha>% and hdi_<1-alpha>%, which is misleading. For example, a 94% HDI does not correspond to the 3% and 97% quantiles (as it’s not a confidence interval).
Proposed Fix
Rename the columns to reflect their meaning more accurately:
Issue: Incorrect Naming of HDI Columns in
summary
outputThanks for producing a very useful and great tool! I've found a small thing that would improve
Arviz
.The
summary
function produces HDI columns labeled ashdi_<alpha>%
andhdi_<1-alpha>%
, which is misleading. For example, a 94% HDI does not correspond to the 3% and 97% quantiles (as it’s not a confidence interval).Proposed Fix
Rename the columns to reflect their meaning more accurately:
on lines 1424-1426 in
arviz/stats/stats.py
, this:should be something similar to this:
This change would improve clarity and prevent confusion about the nature of the HDI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: