Skip to content

Conversation

nbali
Copy link
Contributor

@nbali nbali commented Nov 15, 2022

FirestoreIO version of https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/datastore/EntityToRow.java and https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/datastore/RowToEntity.java to avoid manual mapping of objects to the Firestore native format.

Fixes #24167

TODO:

  • unit tests (check if there is any case not covered)

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Choose reviewer(s) and mention them in a comment (R: @username).
  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • [ ] Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

@nbali
Copy link
Contributor Author

nbali commented Nov 15, 2022

Run Java PreCommit

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 60 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 14, 2023
}

/**
* Create a random key for a {@code Row} without a keyField or use a user-specified key by
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nbali nbali Jan 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

outdated javadoc / missing feature TBD which one

@nbali nbali marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2023 00:29
@nbali
Copy link
Contributor Author

nbali commented Jan 17, 2023

R: @pcostell

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Jan 17, 2023
@vishinde
Copy link

hi @nbali can you pls share when will this feature be available in master to use? I would like to use/test this functionality

@nbali
Copy link
Contributor Author

nbali commented Jan 20, 2023

@vishinde Quite frankly it's not up to me at this point.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 60 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Mar 22, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Mar 29, 2023
@SoerenHenning
Copy link

Would be great if this could be put back on the agenda again. As far as I understand, this will also solve the issue raised here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71163275/add-document-to-firestore-from-beam-with-auto-generated-id

@Luiscri
Copy link

Luiscri commented Sep 1, 2025

Why was this not considered? It's a great addition to the current Java SDK which will make easier to work with Firestore service

@nbali
Copy link
Contributor Author

nbali commented Sep 4, 2025

idk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request]: Row conversion support for FirestoreIO
4 participants