You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 20, 2018. It is now read-only.
When you write a module B and it depends on a module A, any clients depending on B also end up depending on A. This acts transitively, too, such that anything depending on a module C, itself depending on B, will import all of A, all of B, and all of C (the one they actually meant).
This is only going to lead to dependency hell.
We need to be able to evaluate terms in B without requiring the environment & context to already contain the definitions from A.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is a much worse issue stemming from this where if C shadows definitions in A which are used in B, B will use C’s definitions. This is as bad as overriding methods in subclasses.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
When you write a module
B
and it depends on a moduleA
, any clients depending onB
also end up depending onA
. This acts transitively, too, such that anything depending on a moduleC
, itself depending onB
, will import all ofA
, all ofB
, and all ofC
(the one they actually meant).This is only going to lead to dependency hell.
We need to be able to evaluate terms in
B
without requiring the environment & context to already contain the definitions fromA
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: