Idea: Computer use as a navigator

[genidma]

• Well, I am thinking it would be better if there was a version of Computer Use that was geared towards guiding the human or humans.
• This could also help enable a form of computer use that is not as token hungry. Then, a more affordable version of Computer Use could be developed. Matching it with Chatgpt's existing offering and helping Computer Use become more scalable.
• The navigator option itself could evolve in a whole variety of different ways.
• Some of my thoughts and ideas via the Maven app are on topic here.
• However, great care is required in order to limit harmful behaviors and manipulating or tricking the construct for universally bad purposes
• Separately, the issue of determining intent. This is an ever-evolving discussion. Different agencies have taken the lead here. But it's a much wider conversation from multiple angles and not just technology. Which is not an anti technology comment.
• However computer use and other means of providing services evolve, the means via which intent is deduced will continue to be of great importance and significance.
• This also is a much wider discussion. For some reason graph theory comes to mind. But as of right now, I do not know anything about this topic. But also something that was mentioned via Def news.
• Google's existing work related to cv will be of benefit here. There's two other areas that could be of benefit here.  

Overall, if Computer Use as a navigator can indeed be enabled in a safe and secure manner (for humans and other lifeforms), then it could be a great service.

On topic, in random order:

• Github CEO's TED Talk: Link
• Sequoia's blogpost. link. Note: At least I have not received an email based response from dcahn. No hard feelings.
• Team Programming. Note: I have two videos on my Youtube from a while back. Titled: 'Dynamic scalability of teams' and another video with the title of 'mob programming' (or Team Programming going back to the entry from Wikipedia linked here)
• Fusion Cell
• There is one super interesting blogpost via Deepmind. Where they trained, I think, it's agents, I am not sure on how to play video games.

Towards the conclusion of this idea.

• Here is a random gif via Wikipedia.
  Newton's Cradle
• Now if there was some kind of a structure on either side of the cradle. Whereby metallic objects were suspended via strings. Then: 1. Contingent upon the hypothesis that the pendulum itself is magnetic. We know from observing other magnetic pendulums that this hypothesized pendulum is not (97% probability) going to travel in a straight line. 2. It would be interesting to observe, how the metallic objects suspended via the strings themselves (on either side) would behave. If the magnet were to somehow travel in a straight line, then the metallic objects should in theory make some kind of a wavy motion. However, now that there is a dynamic between the magnetic pendulum and the magnetic objects. I was just curious what kind of a pattern will be exhibited. Completely random ;) Also curious if the cradle was of different configuration. Typical Newton's Cradle vs a more round shape vs some other shape.