Refactor playground to be more useful #1623
Labels
contributions welcome
Good for people looking to contribute
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
Currently, https://github.com/amannn/next-intl/tree/main/examples/example-app-router-playground is used for e2e testing.
That's absolutely fine, but I think if we'd refactor it to something like https://app-router.vercel.app it could also be helpful to document more advanced use cases.
Therefore, I'd propose to refactor the playground example to:
Related to this, https://next-intl-example-app-router.vercel.app is also a bit random in what it demonstrates. It's a basic test for i18n routing, it might make sense to clarify which patterns to demonstrate on this example and potentially include a few more features like date formatting. This is TBD.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: